<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Experimenting With FULLTEXT Indexing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/2009/09/12/experimenting-with-fulltext-indexing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/2009/09/12/experimenting-with-fulltext-indexing/</link>
	<description>Your premium source for custom modification services for phpBB</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:39:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rathbun</title>
		<link>http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/2009/09/12/experimenting-with-fulltext-indexing/comment-page-1/#comment-3067</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rathbun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/?p=330#comment-3067</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not saying what I want to very well it seems.

I know that when I search by text fields it doesn&#039;t pay attention to dates. What I had hoped, or rather what I had expected, was that the most &quot;relevant&quot; posts would be the most recent because the discussions are better. Instead when I search for words X, Y, and Z often times I come up with a topic with a single post from four years ago. It&#039;s not very helpful, and I know there are other topics (posts) that in my mind would match better.

It&#039;s an issue of the relevance engine, not really the dates. I wasn&#039;t clear about that before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying what I want to very well it seems.</p>
<p>I know that when I search by text fields it doesn&#8217;t pay attention to dates. What I had hoped, or rather what I had expected, was that the most &#8220;relevant&#8221; posts would be the most recent because the discussions are better. Instead when I search for words X, Y, and Z often times I come up with a topic with a single post from four years ago. It&#8217;s not very helpful, and I know there are other topics (posts) that in my mind would match better.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an issue of the relevance engine, not really the dates. I wasn&#8217;t clear about that before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dog Cow</title>
		<link>http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/2009/09/12/experimenting-with-fulltext-indexing/comment-page-1/#comment-3066</link>
		<dc:creator>Dog Cow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/?p=330#comment-3066</guid>
		<description>MySQL FULLTEXT doesn&#039;t know anything about the dates of posts. Therefore, you need to use an AND clause with post_time column</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MySQL FULLTEXT doesn&#8217;t know anything about the dates of posts. Therefore, you need to use an AND clause with post_time column</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rathbun</title>
		<link>http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/2009/09/12/experimenting-with-fulltext-indexing/comment-page-1/#comment-3065</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rathbun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/?p=330#comment-3065</guid>
		<description>Use an AND clause ... to do what? Limit the search to more recent posts?

What I had expected (hoped) was the relevance engine would do that job for me. I know my board; I know the content very well. Okay, so I don&#039;t have all 500,000 posts memorized, but I do know what I expect to see. So far, I&#039;m not getting it.

More experimentation is required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use an AND clause &#8230; to do what? Limit the search to more recent posts?</p>
<p>What I had expected (hoped) was the relevance engine would do that job for me. I know my board; I know the content very well. Okay, so I don&#8217;t have all 500,000 posts memorized, but I do know what I expect to see. So far, I&#8217;m not getting it.</p>
<p>More experimentation is required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dog Cow</title>
		<link>http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/2009/09/12/experimenting-with-fulltext-indexing/comment-page-1/#comment-3064</link>
		<dc:creator>Dog Cow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/?p=330#comment-3064</guid>
		<description>&quot;They keep pulling up posts from three or four years back.&quot;
You can use an AND clause, you know. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They keep pulling up posts from three or four years back.&#8221;<br />
You can use an AND clause, you know. <img src='http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rathbun</title>
		<link>http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/2009/09/12/experimenting-with-fulltext-indexing/comment-page-1/#comment-3063</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rathbun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/?p=330#comment-3063</guid>
		<description>I have been testing with IN BOOLEAN MODE and specifying various different search terms that I am very familiar with. They keep pulling up posts from three or four years back. If I go this route, I believe I am going to have to come up with some sort of weighting so that more recent posts carry more weight somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been testing with IN BOOLEAN MODE and specifying various different search terms that I am very familiar with. They keep pulling up posts from three or four years back. If I go this route, I believe I am going to have to come up with some sort of weighting so that more recent posts carry more weight somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dog Cow</title>
		<link>http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/2009/09/12/experimenting-with-fulltext-indexing/comment-page-1/#comment-3062</link>
		<dc:creator>Dog Cow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/?p=330#comment-3062</guid>
		<description>Are you using the right search type? There&#039;s boolean, and then there&#039;s some other types as well. You need &gt; 5.0 for the best searching features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you using the right search type? There&#8217;s boolean, and then there&#8217;s some other types as well. You need &gt; 5.0 for the best searching features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rathbun</title>
		<link>http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/2009/09/12/experimenting-with-fulltext-indexing/comment-page-1/#comment-3061</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rathbun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/?p=330#comment-3061</guid>
		<description>So far I have been underwhelmed by the accuracy of the search results. When ordered by &quot;relevance&quot; I get lots of unrelevant posts. Or I get posts that I know are not even close to the best answer to the question.

I have been experimenting with running search queries directly on the database. Eventually I will alter search.php to provide the interface required to let the users do the same sort of search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far I have been underwhelmed by the accuracy of the search results. When ordered by &#8220;relevance&#8221; I get lots of unrelevant posts. Or I get posts that I know are not even close to the best answer to the question.</p>
<p>I have been experimenting with running search queries directly on the database. Eventually I will alter search.php to provide the interface required to let the users do the same sort of search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dog Cow</title>
		<link>http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/2009/09/12/experimenting-with-fulltext-indexing/comment-page-1/#comment-3060</link>
		<dc:creator>Dog Cow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/?p=330#comment-3060</guid>
		<description>Good to see you&#039;re making the right decision. ;-) Yeah, FULLTEXT seems like it&#039;s got some draw-backs (one of them being index size roughly 3/4 of data size), but really, when you weigh the pros versus cons, it&#039;s truly the way to go when you want a lot of flexibility in the search. MySQL has come a long way since a lot of the discussions on it at phpbb.com back in 2003-04.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see you&#8217;re making the right decision. <img src='http://www.phpbbdoctor.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Yeah, FULLTEXT seems like it&#8217;s got some draw-backs (one of them being index size roughly 3/4 of data size), but really, when you weigh the pros versus cons, it&#8217;s truly the way to go when you want a lot of flexibility in the search. MySQL has come a long way since a lot of the discussions on it at phpbb.com back in 2003-04.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

